In ganglion cells- m and p cells that project –
Increasing complexity –
Cognitive psych methodology : what are ruled out explanations and problems with confirming evidence? Going to do a study and you want to say that that eveidence confirms your theory- that whenever you have confirming eveidecne there always has to be and explanation for this.
The Herman Gird in relation to ganglion cells- on center off surround cells- what the eye focuses on –
What cause the neuron to fire- there is a circular image inspace – receptive field for this cell – ganglion
Firing rate of cell has to do with the change of light in the object being portrayed
Ganglion cells in the fovea have smaller receptor fields than those in the bigger reecptve fields the receptive fields re being tricked-
Bipolar cells are responsible for producing the on center of center
Ponser tests- the attention is moving due to what they are told to do- covert shift of attention- all is happening enternally when the subject changes attetion of focus
Overestimating in the assumption of pur insertion/ underestimating the assumption of additivity,-0----------subtractive method section----detection stage + decision
Add one stage to another first stage always stays the same
Natural object and feature theory – more misleading because of natural shapes and may not be recognized as much
Interferece effects- if perception and imagery takst interer then thye must requiere the same mental system
Lack of correspondence- representation in head is not the same as the distal stimulus
Paradoxical Corresepondence-accurate rep of what is out there
No comments:
Post a Comment